Edo council chairman petitions IG, DSS others over alleged looting of office

Hon Tajudeen Alade, the chairman of Akoko-Edo local government, has denied his alleged impeachment and reported an invasion of his office by suspected thugs. He has filed petitions with the police and the DSS regarding this incident.

Impeachment Controversy

Hon. Tajudeen Alade claims that his impeachment was unconstitutional and carried out without due process.

He asserts that the impeachment was orchestrated by a minority of councillors seeking access to the council's treasury.

Invasion of Office

Alade reported that his office was invaded by suspected thugs, who attempted to forcibly take over.

He has taken legal action by petitioning both the police and the State Director of the Department of State Services (DSS) regarding this invasion.

Response from Councillors

Following the impeachment, the acting chairman, Alabi Oshionogue, announced the formation of a committee to recover missing assets from the council.

Alade's supporters argue that the impeachment lacked proper notification and fair hearing, as required by law.

Legal and Political Implications

Alade's team is preparing to challenge the impeachment in court, citing procedural irregularities.

The situation has led to heightened tensions within the local government, with accusations of political maneuvering and misconduct among councillors.

The situation involves a council chairman who has expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his petition regarding alleged misconduct. He claims that despite sending his petition to various police authorities, including the Inspector General and the AIG Zone 5, none have responded or taken action.

The letter from C. O. Osemeilu Law Firm, as reported, details the involvement of approximately ten individuals in the incident concerning the alleged looting of the council chairman's office. It also addresses the disappearance of the chairman's belongings, highlighting the need for accountability and action from the relevant authorities.

Involvement of Individuals: The letter identifies around ten individuals who are implicated in the incident, suggesting a coordinated effort in the alleged wrongdoing.

Additional Participants: It also notes that there are others who participated in the act, indicating that the issue may be more widespread than initially thought.

Missing Items: The petition outlines that the incident resulted in the disappearance of several personal belongings of the chairman, including:

A desktop computer

Laptops

Other unspecified items

Implications of the Incident

Legal Action: The mention of specific individuals and the nature of the items missing may lead to potential legal actions against those involved.

Need for Investigation: The situation calls for a thorough investigation by law enforcement to address the allegations and recover the missing items.

There are reports indicating that the DSS had intelligence suggesting a potential attack on the client and his office, prompting security measures to be implemented by local authorities. This situation highlights the importance of proactive security responses in the face of threats.

Alade has raised serious concerns regarding the DPO's inaction during the looting of his office, suggesting that the police were present but did not intervene. He is urging security agencies to conduct an investigation and interrogate those involved to clarify the situation.